Assumption correct…What a surprise… a new file built on newer tools, not yet “leaked” / shared…this is really “unsual” humm?
More than 90% are so or do you think that an OEM will be the last to be served by Intel and end users are a priority in this chain?
Thats what this threads encourages to… share NEW tool builds/findings, whenever is possible.
So keep digging and maybe you’ll contribuite to this forum…instead of waiting for them.
1 Like
Intel has no revisions for their CSME System Tools packages. The idea of numbering CSME System Tools with revisions was used by the person who was posting them on this site - Platomav. If he doesn’t post them anymore, then accordingly there are no more new revisions. But the Intel did not stop releasing new ME firmware as well as new versions of System Tools with them. So if you want to find them you should look exactly for System Tools with major.minor.hotfix.build version you want, but not for the mythical revision which doesn’t excist.
1 Like
Meatwar, I was going to let your last AI screed go, but then I saw this little ditty, so here goes. It’s going to be better to stay away from me. You are by far the most surly person I’ve ever run across on any forum I’ve been on, and I’ve been on a few in my day. For the record, I’ve really put you on “ignore”, because I’ve never seen you give any advice that I’ve found useful. Half the time, you’re telling people to go pound sand anyway.
I don’t care if I annoy you. Then again, who doesn’t annoy you?
That’s exactly what I was doing - giving folks a heads up to be on the lookout for a new new one, with some info to back it up. And you can bet your bottom dollar that I’ve done plenty of digging, and will continue to do so.
I don’t need you to call me out over BS because you can’t control your temper. So from now on, just walk on by.
1 Like
SYSTEM ISSUE DETECTED
Processed by AI: Your previous post has enough grammatical errors, that can induce young users to perform bad at school, please use a decent translator
Welcome to my Fan list!!! and feel free to read and use any supposedly useful information i may accidentally had provide to the forum…
MERRY CHRISTMAS and DRIVE SAFE.
15.0.50.2633_CON_H_B_PRD_EXTR_859E269A
15.0.50.2633_COR_H_B_PRD_EXTR-Y_F969B3D2
15.0.50.2633_COx_H_B_PRD_EXTR.rar (7.0 MB)
FIT 15.0.35.1951 had a problem when decompressing the source files. Hopefully these files can be used regardless.
3 Likes
thanks a lot for keeping this threat up2date!
small little question, is this fw 15.0.50.3633 also available for COR_LP platforms (lenovo T15 - i7 gen11)?
Thanks again
For at least the consumer extract (15.0.50.2633_CON_H_B) the PCHC component (15.0.0.1021) is still included in the binary. Using FIT 15.035.1951 I’m having difficulty removing the additional partition and am ending up with two Platform Controller Hub Configurations. Is there an easy way to post the MEI extract without the additional PCHC partition? Thanks!
15.0.50.2633_COR_H_B_PRD_EXTR-Y_F969B3D2.rar (5.5 MB)
15.0.50.2633_CON_H_B_PRD_EXTR_859E269A.rar (1.7 MB)
4 Likes
CSE ME 14.1.75.2420 Cons LP.zip (1.8 MB)
CSE ME 15.0.50.2633 ConsLP.zip (1.7 MB)
CSE ME 15.0.50.2633 ConsLP TGLR.zip (1.7 MB)
The second file reads completely identical in MEA but it’s not. Marked TGLR from Dell: :
From Inspiron 14 5410, Version=2.30.0, Model=0B23,0B23,0B24,0B24,0B25,0B26
2 Likes
15.0.50.2633_CON_LP_B_PRD_EXTR.rar (1.7 MB)
@lfb6
Why did you delete them? I guess you would have posted the same ones.
1 Like
Yep, but when I edited my post and changed it to ‘answering to thread’ instead to a person, it automatically goes from ‘edit’ to ‘reply’. And when editing first post third time it seemed to me it had taken the changes, but didn’t.
Now the reason I posted this again is that Dell had this different(?) TGLR file, 3 different hashes in the CSME when unpacking. But I don’t think the CSME itself is different, the complete update files are stitched differently:
PHY N 16.107.126.3011 vs. 11.225.276.2043
PMC 150.1.20.1041 vs. 150.1.20.1042
2 Likes