[Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions/Reports/Suggestions

BIOS/UEFI Modding BIOS Modding Guides and Problems
2157

Sorry. I have corrected my post, it was iakoboss7 that had the same Python reporting as mine (until it was in fact fixed).

2158

Fixed
UBU.zip (18.2 KB)

For those getting no MCE output:

Clean up Python and install it with

winget install python3
pip install colorama pltable
2 Likes
2159

Tested, and there are even more “Press enter to exit” than before
1 (see 2) each time

Otherwise I have this message after the listing of EFI and OROM, what is it exactly ?

UEFIReplace v0.25.0 will be used.

Thanks for your great work

EDIT : @Gregory_Tumanyan You “mod” the UBU file because @SoniX’s is not up to date ?
I tested the SoniX one (1.80) and I have this error

R - Start replacement
0 - Cancel
Choice:r
        [Preparing for replacement]
BIOS file backup
Dummy GUID: GUID replaced
mCode GUID: GUID replaced
mCode GUID: GUID replaced
        [Replacement]
'`for' n’est pas reconnu en tant que commande interne
ou externe, un programme exécutable ou un fichier de commandes.
mCode FFS:

No problem with the one from 1.79

2160

UBU 290924.zip (18.2 KB)

  • Fixed MCE.exe “Press enter to exit”
  • MCE now parses BIOS only when asked to, no flicker window anymore
  • In case of MCE error, MCE error output is shown
3 Likes
2161

All is goof for “Press enter to exit”

Thanks so much

2162

A post was split to a new topic: [Request] HP EliteDesk 705 G4 sff - AMD cpu mcode mod

2163

I have a problem to download UBU on website mega

2164

@pipes80
>This< link to SoniX’s MEGA account works for me.

3 Likes
2165

Guys, I found an error in UBU v1.80.a17. Is this intentional?

image
image800×558 47.4 KB

2166

Same error for microcode, if it’s the same thing as you (with the SoniX file)
Already reported but no response

2167

since yesterday I’m trying to extract the ami setup with UBU but it continues in the extraction operation creating a text file of over 2 GB

2168

image
image714×901 18.1 KB

image
image712×898 18.1 KB

How important is it that microcode follows the same ordering scheme as the original BIOS? The GenUSRmC.bat files seems to order them from highest to lowest, however after manually editing the generation file I get the proper order of the original BIOS.

2169

Already reported but no response

Gregory_Tumanyan posted while comrade @SoniX is missing

At the end of August, SoniX told me that he had business to take care of in September that would go into October. I’m as sure as I can be that he’ll be back.

1 Like
2170

Got a problem with UBU_v1_80_a17.
It used to work before, now it’s giving errors. (multiple cmd windows opening then auto closing). The bios file is amd, not intel.
ok4jh5kl6

2171

@zenki
Why didn’t you use the currently latest UBU v1.80a19.1?

1 Like
2172

Tried them all from a17 to a19.
Same issue.
It’s weird because it was working fine before

2173

Hi

I tried using the latest UBU version to upgrade the microcodes on my Asrock Z270 Pro4
I used FPT -bios -d to extract the bios region.

When replacing the microcodes, the program asks if i want to use mmtool or uefireplace, so i tried both and ended up with 2 different bios.bin files. Which one is safe to use with FPT -bios -f ?

μcodes replaced with UefiReplace

μcodes replaced with mmtool_a5

Thanks for the help

2174

No such thing in mods…
Same mcode start offset as the original ASROCK file starts @ 0xC10400, MMtool version produces the same, it should be the best version to pick.

1 Like
2175

Used the mmtool one and all went well. Thanks a lot!

2176

Our guy, SoniX, should be back fairly soon. See his updated UBU-MEGA site.

His friend, Foxy, is giving him a hand right now - see the ChangeLog_b1. Updated UBU is now in Beta stage: UBU_v1_80_b1

Thanks Foxy! Give our guy our best!

2 Likes