As far as I remember I had a similar problem with my former Z68 system. Only the Heci driver (hecix64.sys) worked properly.
I don’t remember from whom I got the link. Do you think, that I should remove it from the start post? This may avoid future irritations of Sony Mobile PC users.
It must be system-specific, maybe BIOS settings incompatibility etc but it’s not really important. If the latest v8/v9.0 drivers work then I guess I’m happy. Oh and yes, as I promised above I checked and it has nothing to do with my stable overclock. Funny thing is that my 6-series system (HM65) works perfectly fine with latest v10 driver. Go figure…
Yes I do, it doesn’t make sense for Sony to have developed a "special/proprietary" ME firmware. The user above did prove that you can safely update to the latest v9.5 firmware version either way. I suggest to remove it, that will indeed avoid any further confusion.
Yes I do, it doesn’t make sense for Sony to have developed a "special/proprietary" ME firmware. The user above did prove that you can safely update to the latest v9.5 firmware version either way. I suggest to remove it, that will indeed avoid any further confusion.
There is also a firmware for ultra mobiles or Atom based laptops. At least I think so.
Intel MEI Tools 1.1.0.1089 and 1.1.0.1106_5M Firmware. The firmware was extracted from a Toshiba or Lenovo BIOS, the tools are found inside the exe containing that BIOS file.
You are obviously mixing the Intel ME Firmware and the Intel ME Drivers. The Intel ME10 Firmware and ME10 Tools can only be used with the newest Broadwell CPU ME10 Mobiles, whereas the Intel ME Drivers & Software v10.0.30.1072 can be installed with all Intel chipset systems from 6-Series up.
@ all: For anyone interested for the Management Engine System Tools, go HERE. For anyone interested for the Management Engine Legacy Firmware (v2.x –> v6.x), go HERE.
You mean MEManuf v10.0.30.1060
Actually for consumer 1.5MB I don’t see the point of having the whole package installed. It just loads services at every boot without actually needing them unless you use AMT, remote capabilities etc which are found at the 5MB business chipsets. It’s similar to the AHCI/RAID driver argument: unless you are using RAID only the driver should be manually installed via Have Disk Method.
I have done some tests with my Z97 system: At first I wanted to check, if any of the ME10 1.5M tools (FWUpdate ME10, MEInfo ME10 and MEManuf ME10) are downwards compatible to my ME9.1 system. So I ran all these tools with my Z97 desktop system. Result: I always got the message, that my ME9.1 system is not supported by the tool. Then I wanted to know the difference between the 1.5M and the M5 version of the complete "Intel ME Drivers & Software Sets v10.0.30.1072". Result: Surprisingly I was able to get both packages installed without any problem or error message, although I have a Customer (1.5M) system. After having installed the 5M version successfully, I ran the Intel Management Engine Software, but I couldn’t get any informations anout my system. That is why I uninstalled the 5M package, rebooted and reinstalled the 1.5M Set, which doesn’t contain the voluminous Intel Management Engine Software of the 5M variant.
Right, the same applies for v9.5.x.xxxx firmware series. The tools will let you do it but the firmware is not compatible either. Basically,
ME Firmware v6.x is for 5-series systems ME Firmware v7.x is for 6-series systems ME Firmware v8.x is for 7-series systems ME Firmware v9.0 is for 8-series systems ME Firmware v9.1 is for 9-series systems & X99 chipset ME Firmware v9.5 is for mobile LP chipset systems ME Firmware v10.0 is for mobile Broadwell systems
Fernando clearly mentions that in the first post as well.