@Fernando, @Pluto
I forgot theme.
It EXE.Scripts inside for install and compile.
@Pluto, thank You
MCE_1.95.5_r277.zip (8.6 MB)
MA_1.283.3_335.zip (8.5 MB)
@Michael_Code
@plutomaniac
Michael any issues in UBU using the new MCE_1.95 released and Python 3.12
I had none in 1.94_r276, using EXE or Py, neither with Python 3.11-3.12 transition
Or any other members?
Thank you
MCE will be re-written with v2 and many old/deprecated/unused features/processes will be removed. The UBU integration was always unofficial and got deprecated once SoniX stopped working on UBU. Some of that old code got removed in the last version, and a lot more changes will follow with the release of MCE v2 in the future.
1 Like
Thank you “Boss”, we can deduce then, that all users who still use MCE in UBU will have to stick with the MCE1.94 build and building their own DB, adding new mcodes, valid statement?
EDIT: Thank you, my friend… as i do suspect that many forums users, specially new comers will persist in using UBU, besides no further recent development, i had to ask this, all the best.
Yes, knowing though that an old version is used with its own functionality, coverage, bugs etc. Someone could also modify UBU to work with newer versions. Either way, UBU is no longer maintained, so it will stop working properly, sooner than later, regardless of MCE.
1 Like
Version 1.94.2 r276 works with UBU but starting from 1.95.5 r277 and 1.96.0 r279 gives an error and does not work under UBU at CPU MicroCode branch.
So long, UBU… 
Im no programmer so the easiest way i found was, on line 1339 change to:
" :if %mce_count% LEQ 0 cecho {0E}{\n}{\t}Microcodes not found or MCE old version{#}{\n} && pause && goto mn1 "
EDIT: Who told you that this was a fix for displayed messages… did you try at least to finish the operation??? Does it do what’s supposed or not???
If doesnt work for you or if you don’t like the messages displayed, then its simple my friend, find yourself a better option.
Not effective, same error:
" Error: file -ubu was not found!"
MCE has a problem - it cant read the Microcode inside Valve SteamDeck BIOS Files
It detects all 3 Revisions:
00890F00 - VGH-A0
00890F01 - VGH-A1
00890F02 - VGH-A2
I just tried and it works with my compiled version.
I recommend to use my version, I always keeps all my apps updated and my compiled version always has latest libraries
1 Like
Thanx (but no new µCodes)
Hi to all, finally after few years off reading this is my first post on forum 
@plutomaniac
If I clearly understand “-ubu” switch was for table formatting in command console with UBU using, right ?
So this could be workaround for UBU fix with MCE version newer than 1.94.2 r276.
In UBU.bat change in lines:
1336: remove “-ubu”
1339: rem whole line
1430: remove “-ubu”
Someone also need to test this fix with reprogramming bios chip in the somekind of mainbard.
And BTW, sorry for my english, it’s not my native language and I’am still learnig
4 Likes
@ro_beri
Thanks for your efforts to solve the problem.
Your workaround seems to have worked with the latest BIOS 5.50 for my AMD X570 Pro4 mainboard:
@Fernando, NCE touch intel, any cosmetic dont help us/ Sorry, without translater, only English from 6 yes old
I don’t understand. Do you mean MCE?
What do you propose?
@Fernando, nothing :
Yes, MCE, TYPO
Changed structure MCE.DB
All questions to our friend @plutomaniac
Sorry, @Ditier
I have a new problem,
After building MCE.exe for v1.96.0 r279, it says:
“MCE Extractor v1.96.0 r0 Dev” instead of “v1.96.0 r279”, why is that?
EDIT: @MeatWar, Can I fix it?
Pre built user, before the official builds from the dev.
EDIT: There’s nothing to fix… its pre builds with new mcodes between the dev releases, perfectly useable, as he can’t do it every time a new mcode pops… understood now?
As soon as the dev releases a new build, replace it, simple.
Every user can do their own mce db and exe.
It’s all documented.
You can edit your posts to add more info, no need a new post with every single time for same subject.
Watch the code on my edit to your post…simple.
1 Like