Hello:
Can anybody give me INTEL CSME TOOLS V16 1735
THANKS!
Have you tried downloading the archive from the post you’re quoting? It’s literally what you need
Big pack for MEA db:
16.0.10.1394_CON_LP_A_PRE_EXTR
16.0.10.1434_CON_LP_A_PRE_EXTR
16.0.10.1450_CON_LP_A_PRD_EXTR
16.0.10.1473_CON_LP_A_PRD_EXTR
16.0.15.1522_CON_LP_A_PRD_EXTR
16.0.15.1545_CON_LP_A_PRD_EXTR
16.0.15.1597_CON_LP_A_PRD_EXTR
16.0.15.1620_CON_H_A_PRE_EXTR
PCHC_ADP_16.0.0.1011_PRE
PCHC_ADP_16.0.0.1012_PRD_AF1561D0
PHY_ADP_N_13.56.209.7225_PRE
PHY_ADP_N_14.207.305.9003_PRE
PHY_ADP_N_14.523.308.8106_PRD_9A4C9AED
PHY_ADP_N_14.523.308.8106_PRE_C4D0F625
PHY_ADP_N_14.527.505.8209_PRE
PHY_ADP_N_14.528.505.8210_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1010_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1011_LP_A_PRD
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1011_LP_A_PRE_4EEAE381
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1012_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1013_LP_A_PRD
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1013_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1015_LP_A_PRD
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1015_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1016_LP_A_PRD_46631FF2
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1018_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1026_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.1.00.1027_LP_A_PRE
PMC_ADP_160.2.00.1037_H_A_PRE_4F632FDD
for MEA db
16.1.25.1885_COR_H_A_PRD_EXTR-Y.rar (5.1 MB)
16.1.25.1900_CON_H_X_PRD_EXTR.rar (1.7 MB)
16.1.27.2176_CON_H_X_PRD_EXTR.rar (1.7 MB)
PCHC_ADP_16.0.0.1013_PRE_FE3CC410.rar (3.2 KB)
PMC_ADP_160.2.00.1036_H_A_PRE_DCC9F32E.rar (60.6 KB)
PHY_ADP_S_13.0.1.7085_PRD.rar (14.9 KB)
anyone has a download link for CSME System Tools v16?
A few posts up, v16 not v16.1: Intel (Converged Security) Management Engine: Drivers, Firmware and Tools (16+) - Special Topics / Intel Management Engine - Win-Raid Forum (level1techs.com)
3 posts were merged into an existing topic: Intel (Converged Security) Management Engine: Drivers, Firmware and Tools (2-15)
What do you mean unknown? It literally tells you what’s wrong.
yah bro.i don’t know can’t build file outimage.bin
bro see 'OEM KM error"
you can fix help me.thanks
@MeatWar thane is using FIT 16 in #6054
(see the changed look of the ‘modular tool’ and “Alderlake” in windows frame)
CSME binaries for MEA
Uploaded to Mega since I can’t attach files yet. Password is Win-Raid.
Combined RAR with all files: 13.57 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.1842_CON_H_A_PRD_RGN_A899244E.rar: 1.72 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.1980_CON_LP_A_PRD_RGN_BAC5A1AA.rar: 1.7 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.1991_CON_LP_A_PRD_RGN_7279DB22.rar: 1.69 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.1991_COR_LP_A_PRD_RGN_13C52721.rar: 5.06 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.2027_CON_LP_A_PRD_RGN_9CAF35B5.rar: 1.7 MB file on MEGA
16.1.25.2091_CON_H_A_PRD_RGN_00AA75A4.rar: 1.7 MB file on MEGA
Intel CSME System Tools v16.1.x
I see there still haven’t been OEM releases of the v16.1 tools released yet so I’m uploading this. This is not an official OEM release, therefore I’ve labelled it r0.
Some version of every tool is in here for at least one OS, except for MEManuf which I haven’t got. I’ve included MEManuf 16.0.15.1735 from the current CSME System Tools v16.0.x r8 package instead.
Modular Flash Image Tool (WIN32): 16.1.25.2091
Modular Flash Image Tool (LINUX64): 16.1.25.2053
Flash Programming Tool (EFI64): 16.1.25.2049
Flash Programming Tool (WIN64): 16.1.25.2049
FWUpdate (WIN32): 16.1.25.2164
FWUpdate (WIN64): 16.1.27.2181
MEInfo (WIN64): 16.1.25.1932
Manifest Extension Utility (WIN32): 16.1.25.2053
Manifest Extension Utility (LINUX64): 16.1.25.2053
Mega link: (password is Win-Raid): 37.26 MB file on MEGA
There cannot be any official OEM releases, only leaks. System Tools is a part of confidential CSME kit from Intel given to OEMs for building Intel based platforms’ firmware images. These tools should not be freely distributed for everyone.
Of course you haven’t got the correct version of MEManuf, because you probably haven’t spent a ton of time researching, sourcing and crawling OEMs to get a full Tools kit. Most likely you just downloaded one of the last bios source leaks and post the finished product of other people’s work. Who asked you to do this release consisting of programs of different versions taken from different sources, with incorrect MEManuf? Those who really needed tools already have them.
Did it ever occur to you why Plutomaniac removed all links to the tools and the v16 repository? Maybe he was tired of spending his personal time on people who give nothing, extracting and identifying firmwares, storing and packaging repositories, tools, updating etc for free during 8 years. Almost everyone comes here only for ready-made and does nothing useful for the community. Look in CSME repository thread, it’s almost dead for months, no one posts new stuff except one or two people. Only a few people actually do the work, and others just coming and using the results for their own business, giving nothing back. Think about it the next time you are going to share something that some people have spent a lot of their time and energy on. And thank you for sharing RGNs.
So your opinion seems to be that the exact same tools are fine to be distributed, just as long as they were left on some OEM’s public FTP server by accident? OK.
This is quite funny. I’m sure writing a web crawler is very hard work.
I see a number of posts in this thread asking for these. Maybe you should read it.
Hmmmmmmmm. Well at least we still have your valuable contribution. Great first post, hope to see more in the future.
If it’s so easy, why you only have pack of different versions taken from different sources without memanuf?
OK, just don’t give out your credit card details if they ask you too.
This is not about me, but in general about respect for other people’s work. To be valuable, if it especially bothers you:
This CSE ME firmware is not in the database
16.0.15.1620_CON_H_A_PRD_RGN_934CB028.rar
16.0.15.1620_CON_H_A_PRE_RGN_F25EF879.rar
Can’t wait for your great web crawler results
Funny argumentation, many of the firmwares found here are found accidentally and in many of the toolsets posted here versions aren’t identical, so what’s the point?
If you think this is someone elses work that’s reposted- please post a link or a source.
I think the forum generally lacks from contributions and structural work, there’s no need for a discussion about “correct” and “incorrect” contributions…