@westlake
Thanks for the important hint, that the available Win10/11 Builds contain different versions of the in-box MS NVMe driver named stornvme.sys. That it why all NVMe driver performance comparison tests should be done with the exactly same Win10/11 Build number.
Tiny correction: The Build Number of the related stornvme.sys file is 10.0.22621.755.
@all
Since I recently got access to a 2 TB WD_black SN850X NVMe SSD, I was able to do some additional benchmark tests by comparing its performance with the 1 TB Samsung 990 Pro SSD (they both do support PCIe 4.0).
Test configuration:
Chipset: AMD X570
OS: Windows 11 v22H2 Build 2261.1413, clean installed onto the Samsung 990 Pro SSD.
Tested NVMe SSDs:
- a) 1TB Samsung 990 Pro (as system drive C:)
- b) 2TB Western Digital WD_black SN850X (as storage drive D:)
Tested NVMe drivers:
- generic Microsoft Standard NVM Express Driver v10.22621.755 dated 10/19/2022
- Micron NVMe Controller Driver v2.1.19.0 WHQL dated 08/03/2021 (forced installation)
- generic Phison NVMe 1.2 Storport Miniport Driver v1.5.0.0 WHQL dated 02/23/2018
- Samsung NVMe Controller Driver v3.3.0.2003 WHQL dated 01/21/2020 (forced installation)
- Intel RST NVMe Controller Driver v17.11.3.1010 WHQL dated 11/25/2022 (forced installation)
Here are the benchmark test results:
(left/upper Pics: Samsung 990 Pro, right/lower Pics: WD_black SN850X)
1. MS Win11 in-box NVMe driver:
2. Micron NVMe driver v2.1.19.0:
3. Phison NVMe driver v1.5.0.0:
4. Samsung NVMe driver v3.3.0.2003:
)
5. Intel RST NVMe driver v17.11.3.1010:
Evaluation:
- Both tested NVMe SSDs are extremely performant, no matter which NVMe driver has been used. Only exception: Intel’s RST driver v17.11.3.1010 gave me bad “Random” Read and Write scores.
- Remarkable difference: When it comes to Random Write accesses of bigger sized files (marked with red color), the Western Digital WD_black SN850X SSD gave me by far better numbers than the Samsung 990 Pro SSD.